Classifying Drinking Water Contaminants for Regulatory Consideration

Classifying Drinking Water Contaminants for Regulatory Consideration

  • Publisher: National Academies Press
  • ISBN: 9780309074087
  • eISBN Pdf: 9780309565349
  • eISBN Epub: 9780309171120
  • Place of publication:  United States
  • Year of digital publication: 2001
  • Month: August
  • Pages: 256
  • Language: English

Americans drink many gallons of tap water every day, but many of them question the safety of tap water every day as well. In fact, devices have been created to filter tap water directly before reaching cups. It's true; however, that the provision and management of safe drinking water throughout the United States have seen triumphs in public health since the beginning of the 20th century. Although, advances in water treatment, source water protection efforts, and the presence of local, state, and federal regulatory protection have developed over the years, water in the United States still contain chemical, microbiological, and other types of contaminants at detectable and at times harmful levels. This in addition to the growth of microbial pathogens that can resist traditional water treatment practices have led to the question: Where and how should the U.S. government focus its attention and limited resources to ensure safe drinking water supplies for the future?


To deal with these issues the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Amendments of 1996 Safe included a request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publish a list of unregulated chemical and microbial contaminants and contaminant groups every five years that are or could pose risks in the drinking water of public water systems. The first list, called the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List (CCL), was published in March 1998. The main function of the CCL is to provide the basis for deciding whether to regulate at least five new contaminants from the CCL every five years. However, since additional research and monitoring need to be conducted for most of the contaminants on the 1998 CCL, the list is also used to prioritize these related activities.


Classifying Drinking Water Contaminants for Regulatory Consideration is the third report by the Committee on Dinking Water Contaminants with the purpose of providing advice regarding the setting of priorities among drinking water contaminants in order to identify those contaminants that pose the greatest threats to public health. The committee is comprised of 14 volunteer experts in water treatment engineering, toxicology, public health, epidemiology, water and analytical chemistry, risk assessment, risk communication, public water system operations, and microbiology and is jointly overseen by the National Research Council's (NRC'S) Water Science and Technology Board and Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. In this report the committee needed to readdress its second report as well as explore the feasibility of developing and using mechanisms for identifying emerging microbial pathogens for research and regulatory activities. The promotion of public health remains the guiding principle of the committee's recommendations and conclusions in this report.

  • Classifying Drinking Water Contaminants for Regulatory Consideration
  • Copyright
  • Preface
  • Contents
  • Executive Summary
    • RECOMMENDED APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE CCLS
      • Two-Step Approach
      • Sociopolitical Considerations
      • Universe to PCCL
      • PCCL to CCL
        • Contaminant Attributes
        • Developing and Implementing a Prototype Classification Approach
    • IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING EMERGING WATERBORNE PATHOGENS
      • Virulence-Factor Activity Relationships
      • Framework
      • Feasibility
      • VFAR Conclusions and Recommendations
  • 1 Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List: Past, Present, and Future
    • INTRODUCTION
    • DEVELOPMENT OF THE 1998 CCL
    • IMPLEMENTATION STATUS OF THE 1998 CCL
      • Research Plan for 1998 CCL
    • LIMITATIONS OF THE FIRST CCL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
    • RELATED SDWA PROGRAMS
      • National Drinking Water Contaminant Occurrence Database
      • Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
    • IDENTIFYING AND SELECTING CONTAMINANTS FOR FUTURE CCLS
    • PERSPECTIVE OF THIS REPORT
  • 2 Sociopolitical Considerations for Developing Future CCLs
    • INTRODUCTION
    • LIMITATIONS OF THE FIRST CCL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
    • USE OF SOUND SCIENCE IN FUTURE REGULATORY DECISIONS
    • NATURE OF THE TASK
    • RISK PERCEPTION
    • PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE SUBPOPULATIONS
    • TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
      • Transparency
      • Public Participation
    • SUMMARY: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 3 The Universe of Potential Contaminants to the Preliminary CCL
    • INTRODUCTION
    • TWO-STEP APPROACH
    • THE UNIVERSE OF POTENTIAL DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANTS
    • DISTINGUISHING THE PCCL FROM THE UNIVERSE
    • GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING SCREENING CRITERIA
      • Criteria for Potential and Demonstrated Health Effects
      • Criteria for Potential and Demonstrated Occurrence
    • FATE OF THE PCCL
    • SUMMARY: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 4 PCCL to CCL: Attributes of Contaminants
    • INTRODUCTION
    • OVERVIEW OF CONTAMINANT ATTRIBUTES
      • Severity
      • Potency
      • Prevalence
      • Magnitude
      • Persistence-Mobility
    • LESSONS LEARNED IN APPLYING THESE CRITERIA
      • Monitoring Data
      • Potency Compared to Monitoring Data
      • Severity
      • Severity and Potency
    • SUMMARY: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 5 PCCL to CCL: Classification Algorithm
    • INTRODUCTION
    • OVERVIEW OF CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES
      • Expert Judgments
      • Rule-Based Methods
      • Prototype Classification Methods
      • Which Strategy to Use?
    • ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF A PROTOTYPE CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FOR CCL CONTAMINANTS
      • The Training Data Set
      • Attribute Scoring
      • Prototype Classification Functions
      • Classification Results Using a Linear Classifier
      • Classification Results Using a Neural Network Classifier
    • DEMONSTRATED USE OF THE TRAINED CLASSIFIER
      • Examination of Misclassified Contaminants
      • Validation Test Cases
      • Prediction for Interesting Test Cases
    • SUMMARY: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 6 Virulence-Factor Activity Relationships
    • INTRODUCTION
    • STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
    • VFAR ANALOGY TO SARS AND QUANTITATIVE SARS
    • FRAMEWORK
    • FORMULATING VFARS
      • Response (Outcome) Variables
      • Descriptor Variables
      • Genomics and Proteomics
    • CURRENT LEVEL OF GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION
      • Microbial Genome Projects and Comparative Databases
      • Molecular Methods for Characterization of Waterborne Microorganisms
        • Protozoa
        • Viruses
        • Bacteria
      • Gene Microarrays and Genomics
    • VIRULENCE AND POTENCY RESPONSE—HEALTH ASPECTS
      • Introduction
      • Viral Examples
        • Influenza—Mutation is Associated with Virulence
        • Hepatitis E—An Emerging Waterborne Infection in the United States
        • Poliovirus and Other Enteroviruses
      • Bacterial Examples
        • Streptococcal Infections
        • Enteric Bacteria
      • Summary
    • PERSISTENCE RESPONSES
      • Mechanisms Responsible for Decay
        • Abiotic Factors
        • Biotic Factors
      • Mechanisms Affording Protection to Microorganisms
      • Range of Decay Rates
        • Determination of Viability
        • Data for Established Pathogens
        • Data for More Recent Pathogens
      • Intrinsic Factors Influencing Decay
    • INTERPRETATION OF ISSUES
      • Data Information and Management Issues
    • FEASIBILITY
    • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • References
  • Acronyms and Abbreviations
  • Appendix A The European Prioritization Schemes “COMMPS” AND “DYNAMEC”
    • INTRODUCTION
    • COMBINED MONITORING-BASED AND MODELING-BASED PRIORITY SETTING (COMMPS)
    • A DYNAMIC MECHANISM FOR SELECTING AND PRIORITIZING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (DYNAMEC)
      • The Chemical Universe
      • Initial Selection of Substances
        • The Safety Net Procedure
        • Quality Assurance/Validation
      • List of Substances of Possible Concern
        • Fact Sheets
        • Flagging Substances
      • Ranking
      • “Selection Box” of 80 substances
        • Grouping of Selection Box Substances
    • REFERENCES
  • Appendix B Matlab Programs for Contaminant Classification
  • Appendix C Biographical Information
    • COMMITTEE MEMBERS
    • STAFF

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

By subscribing, you accept our Privacy Policy